<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Facebook avoid becoming the next AOL?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaelmyers.biz/CRUCES/can-facebook-avoid-becoming-the-next-aol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaelmyers.biz/CRUCES/can-facebook-avoid-becoming-the-next-aol/</link>
	<description>CRUCES and the LivingMarket</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:44:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelmyers.biz/CRUCES/can-facebook-avoid-becoming-the-next-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-1954</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelmyers.biz/CRUCES/?p=2671#comment-1954</guid>
		<description>Very interesting post and a good read. 

I can&#039;t see Aol and Facebook really in the same market. Aol for me was all about getting access to the internet. I already have that access with Facebook and while I can choose to interact within the Facebook site, I don&#039;t feel like I&#039;m trapped. With Aol, that&#039;s exactly what happened, entrapment. &quot;You can&#039;t use the Internet unless you go through us.&quot; 

Facebook will need to remain open to survive so that brands and consumers can tailor it to their personal needs. I agree with you that there&#039;s a danger they could start enforcing non-competition, which of course could be a very negative strategy. They should also be cautious about only allowing people to communicate through Facebook (i.e. AIM for Aol). Give people the flexibility and choice, then you have a greater chance to attract and not repel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting post and a good read. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t see Aol and Facebook really in the same market. Aol for me was all about getting access to the internet. I already have that access with Facebook and while I can choose to interact within the Facebook site, I don&#8217;t feel like I&#8217;m trapped. With Aol, that&#8217;s exactly what happened, entrapment. &#8220;You can&#8217;t use the Internet unless you go through us.&#8221; </p>
<p>Facebook will need to remain open to survive so that brands and consumers can tailor it to their personal needs. I agree with you that there&#8217;s a danger they could start enforcing non-competition, which of course could be a very negative strategy. They should also be cautious about only allowing people to communicate through Facebook (i.e. AIM for Aol). Give people the flexibility and choice, then you have a greater chance to attract and not repel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
